THE AESTHETIC EDUCATION OF MAN,

1794(LETTER 1 UNTIL LETTER 5)

          In the letters by Friedrich  Schiller, his would present the research about beauty  and art. It is the better part where the matter cannot escape from the human moral nature. He gives the basis for his doctrine of art, an indicates clearly and persuasively his view of the place of beauty in human live. In my opinion, according to the issues “With regard to the ideas which predominate in the practical part of Kant’s system, philosophers only disagree, whilst mankind, I am confident of proving, have never done so”. Schiller thought  that  philosophers like to submit to their own shortcomings rather than staying on a borrowed power and foreign support. “Like the chemist, the philosopher finds synthesis only by analysis, or the spontaneous work of nature only through the torture of art” .For the view I understand that everyone can analyze the problem through their respective areas of work to determine the purpose in life. As the author says “moral experience can be applied with greater truth to the manifestation of “the beautiful”.

          In the second letter, Schiller discussed and talk about freedom. Everyone should have the freedom and right to speak . But he doubted if he could use the freedom given to him. The issues is “It is equally incumbent on use to be good members of own age of our own state or country” on this issue which men have to spend his life for himself as much for the country. But in this problem ,man should also be given the freedom to talk about their thoughts and what they think. He was afraid of the interest that is buildings the world will not involve themselves with the most perfect art, that people will be more concern  about the status and position from the quality. In the word of author “ For art has to leave reality, it has to raise itself bodily above necessity and neediness; for art is the daughter of freedom, and it requires its prescriptions and rules to be furnished by the necessity of spirits and not by that of matter”, where because of the art ,freedom of speech more easily done.

           On the third letter, “ Man is not better treated by nature in his first start than her other work are”, man must know whether shackled or not. Man should be a leader and their lives should not controlled by anyone. Man cannot act for themselves in their first appearance to their  features acting for them, rather that their free intelligence. “Thus, when arrived at maturity, he recovers his childhood by an artificial process, he founds a state of nature in his ideas, not given him by any experience, but established by the necessary laws and conditions of his reason, and he attributes to this ideal condition an object, an aim, of which he was not coorgnise ant in the actual reality of nature.”When he reached maturity he will recover his childhood and he will give his own choice  he did not before and than can proceed as if he had come back with a clear  vision and determination of free. It would seem that the physical character simply must be separated from moral freedom, that it is mandatory to adjust the container with the law and both dependent each track , it is desirable to remove the former is far from the matter and bright the relatively closer to him. The physical and moral paving the way for the transition from the energy authority solely to the law, without preventing the development.

         Next, accordingly if they want to depend on human moral behavior as a natural result this behavior should be a character, and he must be led by nature impulse to course of action as the only and often can get moral decision. But the human will be perfectly free between inclination and duty, and need to be physically fit in as a disciple in this magisterial personality. We know people who will always remain uncertain, and do physical force can change their personality. Schiller have told he admit that in a one side estimate from the point of view of morality this difference vanishes, for the reason is satisfied if her law prevails unconditionally. He will feel satisfied if the moral view of  society has changed and the law also exists unconditionally in favour of certain parties only because it is something that is not fair in life. Everything should unite fo freedom to get the harmonies in life.

               “The child of nature, when he breaks loose, becomes a madman; but the art scholar, when he breaks loose, becomes a debased character”. Art  is a very beautiful. In fact a matter that must depend on ourselves to go to whether to go to wards goodness oe evil. Art is one of the best ways to express ourselves and express themselves with art. The world without humanity and sympathy will not have love and get a freedom in live.